Sentient but unborn babies have legal and moral rights too; like not to be killed, Carla Foster!

Self-explanatory.

By Stanley Collymore  
 
That child was capable of a life,  
that you most callously and  
very deceitfully deprived  
it of Carla Foster, and as such you’re a  
pitiless murderess, quite deserving of  
a jail sentence, which you discernibly  
very clearly reassuringly got, but one  
far too leniently so I personally think  
because the dreadful suffering, very  
obviously and so cruelly endured by  
your baby, and rather unnecessarily  
so, is to any intelligent, and equally  
conscionable mind rather similarly  
patently, thoroughly unimaginable.  
 
I say and write this because I’m  
unequivocally pro-choice and  
rather distintinctively so, as  
regards women even within honourable  
bona fide marriages as it’s undoubtedly  
their own bodies; and both naturally, as  
well as unquestionably, in my plausible  
thinking; coercion of any kind, oughtn't  
to be a part of their criterion, in having  
or raising children. However, distinctly  
when a woman literally gets pregnant,  
quite regardless, of the means of that  
happening, voluntarily or involuntarily,  
being the case; then rather knowingly  
does carry that child almost full term  
only to then callously, or indifferently,  
or even on a whim then dispose of it  
as you’ve basically and malevolently  
done; that in my conscionable mind  
is clearly, cold-blooded murder pure  
and simple; and the court custodial  
sentence that you were then legally  
and morally given, although strictly  
in principle spot on, and irrefutably  
perfectly correct was basically too  
significantly so child's play literally  
in relation to what you should very  
obviously, clearly have been given.  
 
For you knew all along Carla Foster,  
now a publicly known convicted  
baby killer, how significantly  
advanced your pregnancy was; just as  
you were distinctly aware of precisely  
what you were clearly both criminally  
and immorally doing; an evil state of  
affairs that judge both sensibly, and  
morally recognized, and thus rightly  
punished your discernibly arrogant,  
high handedly malevolent, plus too  
your demonstrably, actually selfish  
and odiously, egregious action! As  
is in the irrefutably laudable name  
of everything, that's fittingly moral  
and decent, 20 weeks is distinctly  
a long enough period distinctively  
for any genuine characteristically  
responsible mother to truly make  
a quite rational decision, whether  
to abort a pregnancy or basically  
carry on with it, as do millions of  
quite ordinary pregnant mothers  
globally and give birth to a baby!  
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore  
13 June 2023.  
 
 
Author's Remarks:
I don't see how Carla Foster was ever vulnerable! She's fully an adult not a frightened teenager and moreover is already a mother of 3 children. Why then was she allegedly "embarrassed" to go to her doctor in the appropriate time to request a termination of her pregnancy?  
 
To terminate what is very essentially a human life even though it is basically a baby but unborn at 8 months, is clearly just plain barbaric, and those who're in the process of supporting Carla Foster, doing so with all their distinctly inane arguments that aren't rationally in any realistic way arguments of any kind are very effectively no better than this very immoral, rather deceitful and distinctly lying woman herself. And undoubtedly like her are just as callous and horribly inhumane to such vulnerable and also crucially unborn babies.  
 
And essentially therefore for each and every one of you literally intellectually challenged morons this was effectively about the ending of a very vulnerable human life! Predictably so as life is all very cheap these days and accordingly there's no respect for it, transparently so, by scum like yourselves! Precisely, as it was in Victorian days; and, as is blatantly self-evident in Brexit cesspit Britain, retrogression and manifestly not progression is quite self-evidently the order of the day.  
 
Finally, contraception is quite readily available and abortion is legal also in Britain up to 24 weeks so distinctively there's actually no excuse to terminate after the legal deadline.  
 
I'm positive that Carla Foster has heard of the concept of adoption as are those that are quite idiotically supporting her vile killing of her unborn baby; so why was that option not utilized by Carla Foster if for whatever personal reasons she didn't want to have that child?  
 
Yet when a very sensible and intelligent articulate white Caucasian female who is similarly British like Carla Foster but very categorically states that she really doesn't want to have any biological kids of her own and furthermore never has done, a decision that her husband also consensually and lovingly supports, yet this lady's mother-in-law is obsessively doing all she can to force her to, in spite of her coherent reasons for not having any children rather clearly outlined by her, we nevertheless have the same vile idiots who're now actively supporting Carla Foster were the very ones rather publicly castigating this young married lady and even branding her as selfish and a traitor to the white race and also the future white generation in Britain, and ostensibly the world, for not doing her part to sustain the white Caucasian race. How more stupid can you get; but that's Brexit Britain for you; thick and toxically verminous as fetid s**t!
 

Author's Note

As per all my previous works.