White Britons' puerile obsession with classism and specifically monarchical brownnosing!

Self-explanatory.

By Stanley Collymore
 
To all those very sycophantic,  
monarchical brownnosers  
clearly bemoaning and  
publicly too, vitriolically castigating  
the UK’s distinctively Middle Ages  
mind-set system quite regrettably  
still clearly embedded in the 21st  
Century doing so basically in this
case for effectively not awarding  
to Louise a title, quite of her own  
coming in the wake of her father  
having been distinctly, made the  
Duke of Edinburgh. Well frankly
let me say this bluntly, and also  
unapologetically. As regardless,  
of how much you may agree or  
readily disagree, with what has  
happened reality had to kick in  
here; not essentially a fawning,  
puerile monarchical fanaticism.  
 
Basically and most effectively in all  
of this Louise Windsor needs to  
quite essentially, first pursue  
her university education; and literally  
when having legitimately, effectively  
qualified in this respect and clearly  
not basically handed a degree just  
because of who she simply is and  
this literally, emphatically coupled  
with her own known, and societal  
position to embark afterwards on  
getting a job, and very essentially  
a proper one. In essence then let  
Louise literally and appropriately  
apply her acquired qualifications  
to doing something simply more  
worthwhile than what the actual  
coterie very essentially basically  
of her distinctly extended family  
are ongoingly doing; perpetually  
as it happens, characteristically  
cutting ribbons for a living. And  
that to me is quite undoubtedly  
an undeniably, rather distinctly,  
mind-boggling, totally pathetic,  
and crazy attitudinal approach  
to seriously set out to earning  
one’s living in an undoubtedly,
modern, 21st Century society;  
even basically so when one's  
actions are accepted publicly.  
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore
11 March 2023.  
 
 
Author's Remarks:
The intense, avidly and even endemically quite asininely subscribed to, as well as passionately believed in notion, that those ostensibly regarded as belonging to a hierarchal and thus a superiorly privileged and likewise societally entitled elite in distinctly classism entrenched Britain, are rightfully there because of which perceived male gloriously assumed in their minds to be adorned as such by divine right has off-loaded his sperm in some equally entitled female’s vagina  resultantly getting her pregnant and consequently quite instinctively have bestowed on their conceived offspring, regardless of the number they produce or their evidently conspicuous stupidity, the automatic birth right not only to be unquestionably deemed infinitely better than the rest of us but likewise also the distinctive and unchallenged right to rule unelected over the rest of us, courtesy of an outmoded and Middle Ages mind-set attitude; a system similarly totally devoid of democracy, any kind of meritocracy and is itself quite blatantly indifferent to equality both in terms of one’s natural ethnicity, as long as it is obviously different from their own, and as well all accepted restrictions on the concept of equality of opportunity.  
 
Under the UK’s first past the post political system, in what passes for its democracy, we’ve had PMs like Tony Blair elected by huge majorities and for more than one term. Should their children therefore because of who they are, similarly as well be automatically in their case be given the keys to Number 10 Downing Street and therefore by birth right become our perspective Prime Ministers?  And if you say no, what’s the essential difference between this notion regarding them, and effectively whose parents were democratically elected, and a monarchical birth right candidate whose parents

Author's Note

As per all my works.