Those of us who're honest and old enough to remember will always take Diana's side!

The callous and self-serving destruction of an innocent teenager.

By Stanley Collymore
 
For clarity - are intelligent people supposedly to sensibly side with those persons who abominably and most egregiously in their own thirties used the very evidently naive and an innocent teenager Diana Spencer?  
 
Conned her into thinking that she was marrying for love, got her to provide the monarichal heir and, similarly, a necessary spare; and crucially all this even before our Diana was 25 years old!  
 
Then idiotically expected Diana to literally turn a blind eye, and also keep her own mouth tightly shut, while her husband Charles and his very likemindedly and arrogantly serial adulterous mistress Camilla quite evidently not regarded as suitable monarichal breeding stock plainly with her unmistakably licentiously trollop pedigree most unceasingly carried on with their squalid affair!  
 
So all the contrived, staged and as well vitriolic outrage regarding the Crown and Harry's upcoming book The Spare evidently not telling the truth, is literally cynical, dishonest, and quite disingenuous deflection. Because when the truth is firmly offered up honestly, unfettered, and quite unequivocally too Charles, Camilla, William and also additionally Kate: amongst these distinctly, principal charlatans with a lot to lose, don't want to see or hear it distinctively because quite rightly to principled minds it makes these toxic vermin look most revolting and evilly bad!
 
(C) Stanley V. Collymore   
1 November 2022.
 
Author's Remarks:    
Brilliantly good for you, Netflix! Blame where it's very rightfully due.
 
For the pathetically, demonstrably obvious, thoroughly sick surfeit of happy monarchical, brownnosing sycophants and additionally both Charles and Camilla, white Karens and likemindedly Gammons clear, immorally adulterous equivalents who say that Diana was neither a saint nor any angel; allow me to very honestly and candidly pose this rather basically, quite honest question to all you evil, odious scum, including the monarchical ones: Charles, Camilla, William and his stalking Stepford wife broodmare Kate Middleton, and naturally also their paid Palace stooges.
 
Should Diana have simply, literally calmly and rather indulgently put up with Charles' distinctly odious, essentially egregious, persistent adultery, crucially concomitant with his similarly so, endemically patently entrenched adulterous trollop Camilla; and accordingly, stayed at home, quite cowardly; actually wearing sack cloth and ashes?
 
Realistically, would you, in similar circumstances? If the answer to that question is an honest "no"; then f*****g well bloody shut up from lambasting Diana on behalf of two cowardly, vile, shameless pillocks: Charles Windsor and his beastly, evil mistress Camilla.