Europe’s 20th Century Yiddish genocide is wholly meaningless without a definitive...

Why is genocide against one lot of people wrong but perfectly alright against others when they're the ones doing it?

By Stanley Collymore

 

“The rights of Palestinians, and even their children, are wholesale denied and it’s appalling.” The words of Chris Gunness, a British United Nations official in Gaza.

 

David Axelrod Barack Obama’s Yiddish-American campaign strategist hired by Ed Miliband the Labour Party Leader who’s hoping to displace David Cameron as Britain’s next Prime Minister after the 2015 British General Elections, has advised Ed not to mention or speak about Gaza or the ethnic slaughter that the Israelis are carrying out there against the perfidious backdrop of the west’s general indifference on the part of its political leadership and that of its media to what’s happening in that besieged and open air concentration camp; and Ed Miliband has happily bought into and cynically gone along with that odious mindset. But he would, wouldn’t he? As Ed Miliband shares the identical point of view to and completely empathizes with these Zionist mass murderers in what they call Israel, so David Axelrod in asking him to behave as he’s doing was affectively knocking at an open door.

 

What a pity then that my Dad, other relatives, their friends, close relations and millions more like them from around the world and what was then called the British Empire who fought and sacrificed their lives, many of them, to liberate Europe from the ravages of rampant Nazism and fascism, saving in the process many European Judaists from the ravaging clutches of Europe’s holocaust and the Final Solution that was prescripted as their ultimate destiny by the Third Reich, the Waffen-SS brigades of the Baltic States of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania, Ukraine, Croatia, Holland, Belgium, France, Greece, Poland and Italy, virtually the whole of mainland Europe then and including those countries that professed rather disingenuously their neutrality like Sweden, Spain, Ireland and Switzerland for example; together with Das britische Freikorps �" comprised exclusively of white Caucasian Nazi volunteers from Britain, Ireland and the white British Dominions of Canada, Australia and New Zealand along with literally tens of thousands of South African, Afrikaner-Boers who apart from serving in the German Wehrmacht also had their own Waffen-SS brigades, didn’t adopt the same callous mindset at that time towards Europe’s Jews per se as that which Ed Miliband and his brother David in tandem with David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Boris Johnson, Theresa May, Ian Duncan Smith, William Hague and significant numbers of those on the front benches of all the major parties and throughout both houses of the British Parliament have towards the Palestinians.

 

For if these so-called “colonials” but nevertheless British Armed Forces volunteers with the RAF, Navy, Army; on convoy duty that protected the supply ships, on which many of these people also served, from the lethal destructive force of the German U-Boats and valiantly prevented the people of Britain from starving, together with their Black, rather grotesquely segregated against but all the same highly courageous American counterparts who admirably distinguished themselves on the battlefields of Europe and in the skies as well, as the genuinely heroic and iconic Tuskegee Airmen did for example, by adopting the identical attitude towards Europe’s Jews as their Yiddish descendants are promulgating in 2014 relative to the present day Palestinians who aren’t only being ethnically cleansed by these European foreigners from their ancestral homeland, Palestine but exterminated as well, neither Ed nor his brother David - also with obsessive aspirations to becoming Prime Minister of Britain �" would be here among the living.

 

Since their Polish Jewish parents who had quite apprehensively but most distinctly fled their mainland European homeland from white Caucasian - the very same ethnic race that they were a part of - and not Palestinian Nazi persecution as nothing of the sort existed, together with a comparable white murderous onslaught against their co-religionists on mainland Europe to Britain to which they had no links to at all, and very much unlike Blacks and other non-white British “colonialists” hadn’t previously made any input �" the Milibands and several others like them I’m referring to here �" to the development of England or the rest of the United Kingdom come to that, but even so were compassionately given asylum with the attendant permission to remain and live in the UK, where Ed and his elder brother were subsequently both born. But had this not happened as did likewise occur to thousands of other European Jews who were summarily turned away in their desperate bid for asylum in the United States �" not even permitted to disembark from the absolutely crammed ships that carried them there or at any ports in Puerto Rico �" on the direct and specific orders of the then US Secretary of State Cordell Hull, but forcibly returned to Europe and afterwards predictably ended up in the gas chambers there, the same fate would have awaited the Milibands and the Jewish Romanian parents of Michael Hecht �" whose surname was conveniently changed to Howard - if Britain hadn’t let them in.

 

Needless to say, but I will none the less to emphasize my point, neither Ed nor David Miliband or Michael Howard �" all of whom are stridently pro-Zionist and unapologetically racist in their attitudes �" wouldn’t have seen the light of day, as frankly with their respective parents duly and contemptuously dispatched of in some God-forsaken European Nazi death camp or other, they couldn’t nor would they have been born. Worst luck I say, given their individual and collective attitudes; not just for the Palestinian people but equally as well anyone with even a modicum of personal integrity and who calls themselves a human being, something that quite noticeably the Miliband brothers, Michael Howard and their exceptionalist sort don’t remotely impress me for my part that they qualify for.

 

So what gratitude then from them, eh? What absolutely amazing compassion for and complete empathy �" I think not �" on their part with the oppressed and most specifically the Palestinians who’re also being genocidially in 2014 being ruthlessly subjected to their Final Solution at the hands of all people Europe’s Judaists. No such sympathy of the kind which they expressly and quite automatically expect and even exclusively demanded for their thuggish kind in relation to Europe’s holocaust, let alone an iota of understanding meted out by these Johnny come lately Yiddish Brits and their similarly loathsome ilk whose unequivocally perverse obsession with obdurately wanting to garner the whole of ancient Palestine solely for them and their own kind, nevertheless equally and rather sickeningly have no compunction whatsoever, as do their likeminded counterparts in the United States, Canada, Australia and Argentina for example, in wresting from others who also live there what lawfully belongs to them, and that also includes the indigenous populations of these countries and regions that but for the compassionate grace of God would long have ceased to exist.

 

Although it’s quite knowledgeable that in Tasmania and Argentina they don’t anymore having genocidially been completely wiped out by the white Caucasian and immigrant interlopers that barbarically replaced them and brutally stole their lands from them; an utterly unflinching and comprehensively dominant and ascendant control: politically, economically, militarily as well as socially in all those said countries other than, of course, their obsessively coveted Palestine where ironically these Yiddish Zionist Judaists choose to live, notwithstanding their concerted and arrant stupidity that Zionist appropriated Palestine according to them and also appreciably buttressed by their sick convention, must for all time and exclusively so remain a fully fledged Yiddish and Judaist state.

 

Which prompts the very obvious and rather pertinent question, at least to questioning folk like me, “Why the hell then are these conspicuously demented, extremely obsessive and completely obstreperous Jewish-homelanders not only living of their own volition in the countries of other people but acutely overbearingly in the process quite puzzlingly too insist on controlling these lands and the other residents there, why not logically instead piss off en masse, all those with that exclusivist Jewish-homelander mindset in relation to Palestine, to that Yiddish El Dorado they have firmly imbued within their minds? And that should include not only the usual Zionist suspects but characteristically in Britain’s case as well the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a most insidious and cancerous entity in our midst if ever there was one, and a strident progenitor and aggressive instigator together with being a vigorous encourager and a tremendously active facilitator of this altogether asinine, perniciously evil and, of course, exceptionalist charade that they and the rest of their sort arrogantly indulge in.

 

As I’m absolutely convinced that with all of them permanently gone, and not just from Britain or the United States alone but from wherever they are now, the genuine global community could and would then most certainly be in a genuinely excellent position �" minus the current, importunate, all-pervasive, absolutely tiresome and categorically destructive interferences in matters of all kinds from these Yiddish Zionists, and notably from the perspective of their host populations who’d no longer find themselves unjustly, intolerably and burdensomely saddled with this Yiddish yoke that they’ve been carrying now for far too long, be both willing and also able I feel to reciprocally make long-term, discernibly constructive and completely unfettered arrangements for the permanent and extensive good of a Palestinian nation that for in excess of seven decades now has quite savagely and systematically been displaced from its historic and ancestral homeland by these thoroughly barbaric, Khazar-descended, utterly inhuman, white Caucasian and Zionist European Judaists.

 

Ethnic cleansing of western ensconced and white Judaists I hear some of you say? Well if you either don’t know or simply haven’t cared about what has consistently been done to the people of Palestine particularly since the cessation of World War II and is currently still going on, then to put it rather bluntly you’re in no moral position to adversely comment let alone criticize any relevant measures, regardless of how drastic these are, to not only alleviate but also and most crucially permanently eradicate the sickeningly ongoing and perilous plight that a shamefully battered, despondent and seemingly universally marginalized, most certainly here in the west, Palestinian Diaspora is forced to recurrently have to endure. And therefore if you can neither recognize nor empathize with any of that and wish for it to drastically change for them and in the process provide a much better future in every respect for all of the Palestinian people, then as far as I’m concerned you’ll be doing not only the Palestinians but every other decent human being as well �" of which you’re evidently not one of them �" an enormous favour by keeping your bigoted and sick opinions to yourself. Or in blunt terms should bloody well shut up!

 

But sure enough the Miliband brothers, David Cameron, Michael Howard, Michael Fabricant, Boris Johnson and the rest of their Yiddish Zionist lot who also control our banking and other financial sectors �" why is that no surprise to anyone I wonder? �" and just as significantly our media and cinematic industries �" or to more aptly describe them and their specific raison d’être as the hardcore propaganda dispensers and assiduous public manipulators that they are �" the likes of the commercial corporate media, most notoriously those in the stables of arch-Zionist and the consummate opportunist Rupert Murdoch alongside our own and pretty shamelessly sycophantic to the political establishment-sectors elite, supposedly state owned but statutory, public compulsorily paid for BBC, don’t see any contradiction at all in this foul and sadistic behaviour of theirs.

 

And to these ends the irrepressible, control-freakism and totally unyielding obsession not only on the part of the Miliband brothers but other Yiddish Judaists as well to ultimately become the Prime Minister of Britain for example, or else get the opportunity to hold down other powerful and very influential offices within the United Kingdom - a situation noticeably matched by the same preoccupation among their ilk throughout other countries across the western hemisphere and even to some extent in Russia and several of the former Soviet Union entities, just check out for yourself who they are and what the religious affiliations, however tenuous these might be, and the associated political ideologies of these thieving oligarchs are �" markedly outweigh everything else as far as they’re either individually or collectively concerned, except of course for their total and unquestioning obeisance to their one and almighty God �" not Yahweh as one might expect or as they cynically, quite self-servingly and with breathtaking mendacity rather religiously make out to be the case among the entirely gullible, utter naïve or downright stupid, but MONEY!

 

The incandescent fury from these pertinaciously feral and detrital specimens of humanity of the likes of Michael Howard, Michael Fabricant, the constituent members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews among numerous others of their sort in Britain, across the Atlantic in the United States like the abhorrent Koch brothers, John Kerry and that absolutely inhuman and detestable b***h Madeleine Albright, and in France and right the way through the rest of mainland Europe comparable sewer rats like Nicolas Sarkozy will be most thunderous and even quite palpable I suspect with vociferous denunciations of these transparently true remarks nevertheless coming thick and fast, not only from them but also their venal Christian supporters of the likes of mass murderer and patently unremorseful war criminal Tony Blair, William Hague, Nick Clegg and Hillary Clinton that these Yiddish-Judaists and Zionists are citizens of the respective countries where they’re located.

 

Quite true and I for one don’t deny them that; but then so too are Blacks and other non-white residents of Britain, the United States of America, Canada, France and the rest of the EU and, in every legitimate and ethical sense, the Palestinians in relation to their ancient and ancestral homeland Palestine; and equally so as the Aborigines of Australia, the Maoris of New Zealand, the Native Americans and, of course, the First Nation people of Canada are in respect of their similarly ancient but brutally dispossessed from them respective homelands.

 

So where’s the logic or commonsense then that while it’s perfectly alright for white Caucasian, Khazar-descended, Yiddish Judaists to freely assert and additionally consolidate that conceited assertion into practical terms by means of the most brutal manner psychologically, itself quite viciously and murderously backed up by an equally unrelenting and savage genociodal crusade against the Palestinian people; a concerted onslaught that’s barbarically and uncompromisingly waged through a massively conducted and noticeably disproportionate state of the art military warfare and ethnic cleansing that’s self-evidently carried out on an asymmetrical scale against what are essentially hapless Palestinians and what resistance they can muster or put up against these barbarities unleashed on them, and all this murderously affected by the white Caucasian interlopers and their categorical western supporters to wrest completely all of historic Palestine from its rightful owners and deliver it to these Khazar Judaists; yet notwithstanding all of this these utterly crazy, Khazar-descended, self-delusional Semites, Europe holocaust, Stockholm Syndrome afflicted Judaists none the less unquestionably believe that they’ve got not only the lawful right to reside in but also rule and literally control in the process those western countries and others that they live in.

 

And as if that isn’t already enough on its own account are similarly of the absolutely perverse and sickening mindset adhered to and promulgated by Yiddish scum like Michael Howard and David Cameron �" remember that racist campaign of theirs when these two clowns specifically and the Conservative party collectively were endeavouring to get Michael Howard: then leader of the Conservative Party and who unopposed had become leader when Ian Duncan Smith an abysmal failure at whatever he does except for marrying into money was kicked out from that position by the Conservative Party’s rank and file in a vote of no confidence in him, elected as Britain’s Prime Minister in the General Election of 2005 that thankfully this loathsome Yiddish b*****d, Michael Howard eventually lost?

 

Succinct and virulently racist but equally unambiguously and insidiously menacing to Britain’s Black and other non-white citizens was Michael Howard and David Cameron’s �" Cameron was Howard’s General Election campaign manager and strategist at the time and also the author of the Conservative Party’s national election slogan: “Are you thinking what we’re thinking?” A vilification and denunciation of Britain’s Black and other non-white citizenry coming straight out of The Third Reich’s genocidal playbook relative to their targeted victims and summarized in the infamous words: “Arbeit macht frei.”

 

So here we had David Cameron’s instigated and Michael Howard and his Conservative Party’s full endorsement of that notoriously bigoted 2005 General Election campaign slogan of theirs, principally from two white Caucasian Jews and significantly supported by many more of their ilk across the British political parties, at the BBC and within the commercial corporate media, as well as major British businesses like Marks and Spencer, Tesco, Sainsbury and Burberry all of whom had this identical Third Reich-Nazi, white Master race ideology that they were avidly peddling and promoting in 2005 and still are in 2014. Yet had it not been for the altruistic and valiant contribution from those Blacks and other non-whites who appreciably helped to stymie the Germans and their Axis allies’ full implementation of their exceptionally well coordinated Final Solution programme but whose contemporary descendants these abovementioned white racist Brits would now in the 21^st century like to systematically and entirely eradicate from the face of Britain, none of these despicable Yiddish b******s �" practising Judaists or not �" would themselves be around today. And why am I not surprised that irony is lost on these disgusting scumbags?

 

For if these Yiddish Nazi-Zionists who run the UK have their way the likes of Diane Abbott - who I shall most definitely be returning to later - Linford Christie, Tessa Sanderson, Brendon Batson, Lenny Henry, Lee Jasper, Viv Anderson, Colin Jackson, Rudolph Walker, Paul Ince or Benjamin Zephaniah regardless of what contributions they’ve made or are currently making to Britain and who anyhow are already considered by this odious Yiddish lot as not being British and therefore according to them they neither have any right to be nor any business at all living in Britain, would either be forcibly kicked out of the country or else summarily eradicated, by whatever means their persecutors saw fit, from what is both lawfully and morally their country. But such legal considerations or moral niceties don’t ever come into the equation with the likes of David Cameron, Michael Howard, Nick Clegg, Michael Fabricant, the Miliband brothers or Boris Johnson to name just a few of these abhorrent b******s who regrettably infest the United Kingdom.

 

Diane Abbott: unmistakably Black, born in England and a graduate of Newham College at the University of Cambridge having before that attended and graduated from the grammar school she went to as schoolgirl, became Britain’s first black female MP when she was elected to the House of Commons on the 11 June 1987 by the voters in the constituency of Hackney North and Stoke Newington to be their parliamentary representative; doing so as the party candidate and a member of the British Labour Party of which she was then and still is a member.

 

Throughout her parliamentary career Diane Abbott was constantly overlooked �" curiously so because it can’t be attributed to her lack of proven intellectual acumen or political ability �" for ministerial or Cabinet office when the Labour Party was in government and similarly so for a front bench shadow ministerial post when the Labour party was in opposition as it currently is. No such impediments though for Yiddish brothers David and Ed Miliband who’ve both held a number of prominent ministerial offices under neo-con PM, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and likewise shadow ministerial and front bench positions in the House of Commons when Labour at the 2010 General Election lost its position as the ruling party to the opportunistically forged Con-Dem alliance that brought the current regime of David Cameron’s Conservatives and Nick Clegg’s Liberal Democrats to power as the new government of Britain.

 

This notwithstanding the quite glaring facts that David Miliband was first elected to the House of Commons as MP for South Shields on the 7 June 2001 and left on the 15 April 2013 when his hubris of rather arrogantly assuming that he would as of right become the next leader of the Labour Party after Gordon Brown’s humiliating defeat as PM in the 2010 General Election and him immediately stepping down as Labour leader was significantly damaged by his extremely unfancied and younger brother Ed pipping him at the post to snatch the coveted Labour Party’s leadership from him. Noticeably humiliated and like his Yiddish lot incapable of facing defeat gracefully, even when it has been markedly brought about in a democratic exercise, David in a huff broke off communications with his brother Ed, refused a shadow ministerial position from him, quit parliament in a tantrum and pissed off to the United States to lick his wounds and get solace from his likeminded neo-con Nazis there.

 

It was quite obvious from David Miliband’s reaction �" sibling rivalry aside �" that he personally didn’t have any real confidence in his brother’s ability, or lack of it more likely, to be leader of the Labour Party let alone the charisma to galvanize that party into becoming once more the government of Britain. From David’s perspective too Ed’s election as party leader was an unmitigated disaster and could only lead to the Labour Party actually being in political opposition much longer than it should, since he really couldn’t envisage his brother ever being elected Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Therefore, he personally wanted absolutely nothing to do with Ed’s triumph or his purported success and purposely decided to wait in the wings instead and bide his time, expecting his brother to fall flat on his face; following which an irascible and understandably acutely disappointed with Ed’s performance Labour Party’s rank and file and especially after his predictable and inevitable defeat at the polls in the next General Elections, having furiously ditched Ed as their party  leader in the same way that the Conservatives had done with Ian Duncan Smith, would come running to him David to rescue them from political oblivion.

 

An interesting scenario that says a lot really and especially to those capable of reading between the lines. For while the Miliband brothers with governmental and shadow ministerial portfolios under their collective belts and both of whom entered parliament long after Diane Abbott did �" David 14 years and Ed, who was elected as the MP for Doncaster North on the 5 May 2005, 18 years respectively �" even though Ed’s own brother David undoubtedly doesn’t consider him as someone capable of effectively leading the Labour Party much less so believe that he’s suitable prime ministerial material �" a view generally shared by several British residents and crucially the voters in all the principal political parties across the UK. Yet none of this has stymied the Miliband brothers’ chances of holding high office or, come to that, harmed their compulsive ambitions of becoming Prime Minister in a way that Diane Abbott �" who I don’t for a single second perceive as being devoid of ambitions herself or for that matter is any less competent than these two Yiddish men are �" would ever be given the same opportunities to satisfactorily demonstrate her own distinctive capabilities, irrespective of what staunch faith and satisfaction she collectively continues to instil in the hearts and minds of the voters of the Hackney North and Stoke Newington constituency or how long they democratically choose to retain her as their Member of Parliament.

 

So clearly something else has to be the intentional deterrent that prohibits a thoroughly capable and longstanding MP like Diane Abbott from achieving even a modicum of the huge potential she definitely has through the ranks of her chosen political party, the British Labour Party. And as it’s obviously not her gender �" there are several white women that held Cabinet portfolios in previous Labour governments and continue to hold their shadow equivalent whenever Labour is in opposition as it now is �" it’s clear as a pike staff on one’s nose, to me anyway, that Diane Abbot’s black race, constantly uppermost in the minds of those doling out these positions of what are essentially patronage for the most part and which have absolutely nothing to do with the usually preferred candidate’s capability or more aptly their lack of any, a situation that rests entirely with the Prime Minister of the day if it’s a Cabinet or other ministerial portfolio and the Leader of the Official Opposition if what’s being shelled out is the shadow equivalent, is her sole handicap.

 

Tony Blair or Gordon Brown didn’t see fit on their part to award Diane Abbott with either a Ministerial or Cabinet portfolio although they quite evidently had no problem accommodating white Caucasian female Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) advocates and avid apologists as senior Cabinet members in their respective regimes; a situation that Ed Miliband the current leader of the Labour Party perceptibly continues to foster with Harriet Harman a former senior Cabinet minister and a principal light as well on the Labour Party’s front bench in the House of Commons now it’s in opposition, particularly in her role as Deputy Leader of the Labour Party, and who with her spouse Jack Dromey is well known to have had very close links, certainly in the recent past, with PIE.

 

Then after Diane Abbott’s noticeably cosmetic bid in 2010 to be the leader of the Labour Party, an absolutely lopsided contest that featured just the two Miliband brothers and herself in which she was eliminated in the initial round of voting and in the succeeding runoff Ed Miliband with the active support of the trade unions’ block vote defeated his brother David; Diane then found herself for public consumption’s sake and to maintain the absolutely dishonest pretence by the Labour Party’s hierarchy that the Labour Party which ironically garners a staggering 99.9% of Black voters support for itself nationally across the United Kingdom is racially an all-inclusive political outfit �" which it evidently isn’t but that doesn’t stop it none the less from levelling this accusation at the Conservative Party which gets minimal support from Blacks �" a critical state of affairs which has vigorously provoked rank and file members of the Labour Party generally and Black voters specifically to angrily demand United States-style primaries in all candidature election contests among those desirous of becoming official Labour Party candidates either at local or national level that would thus make the party more representative of and also directly accountable to its overall grassroots membership and supporters and not just see Blacks, as is quite currently the case, solely as foot soldiers, was after her leadership bid defeat offered and accepted the position of Shadow Minister for Public Health and with it a place for the very first time on Labour’s front bench. However there were many people, myself included, that quickly saw through this for the rather patronizing gesture and sanctimonious bribe which it was from Ed Miliband.

 

Notwithstanding that however, so good however was Diane Abbott at what she was now tasked to do, undoubtedly in the process obtaining firsthand information from her mother who worked in the National Health Service (NHS) as a nurse, that the Daily Telegraph, which by no stretch of the imagination can be categorized as a leftwing newspaper but rather is routinely very pro-Establishment in its publications, in other words is a very distinctly conservative medium �"in an objective analysis of how Diane Abbott was actually doing in her job stated in an article on the 27 September 2011 that she had “become one of Labour’s best front bench performers.”

 

Nevertheless, this didn’t appeal to the Yiddish leader of the official opposition Labour Party in the House of Commons Ed Miliband who in his capacity of Labour Party leader summarily on the 8 October 2013 sacked Diane Abbott and instantly replaced her with Luciana Berger whose sole qualification for the job and to be Diane Abbott’s replacement was that Luciana Berger is as Yiddish as Ed Miliband is himself. For here was a woman just recently elected on the 6 May 2010 to parliament as the MP for Liverpool Wavertree, with bugger all experience of anything whatsoever that could remotely be termed as significant prior to that point, was conspicuously a goddam rookie in parliament, hadn’t made any perceptible impact in parliament generally or more crucially as one would evidently have expected given the circumstances of her bizarrely stellar promotion to shadow ministerial status by fellow Yiddish associate Ed Miliband; and is quite frankly someone that most British voters of all parties wouldn’t recognize in the street if they were unfortunate to came across her let alone have a bloody clue who exactly this woman is if they weren’t expressly told; and not to put too fine a point on it �" which I certainly won’t �" hers is an appointment that distinctly leaves the ghastly taste of Yiddish nepotism in the mouth.

 

An appointment that obviously has all the senseless hallmarks about it as if a new recruit to the Royal Air Force who’d enlisted into the ranks, had no previous military experience or training, not even in the cadets, was nevertheless even before he or she had properly finished their basic training was all the same invited by the Air Chief Marshall of the RAF to be Group Captain at the local RAF base which that person was stationed at. Nothing so completely irrational would happen of course but I’ve nevertheless used this obviously outlandish example to demonstrate how absolutely farcical Luciana Berger’s appoint was and still is. No such inadequacies though can justly be levelled at Diane Abbott. But hey what the hell, as I said earlier and still maintain, all that actually mattered to Ed Miliband relative to this woman Luciana Berger is that like him she’s Yiddish; and rancid nepotism, even of the incestuous kind, is intensely embedded in their DNA. And reverting to the military analogy I touched on previously, while these collectives of Yiddish b******s eschew putting themselves on the line in the defence of Britain as those of my kind and other non-whites characteristically do they’ve no compunction at all in being desirous of running this here United Kingdom and conceitedly controlling the lives of the rest of us who live in it; and while I don’t claim to speak for anyone else apart from myself that is a scenario I personally take great exception to!

 

However, notwithstanding this transparently compulsive urge of the Yiddish folk in our midst to run Britain and control the lives of the rest of us who live and belong here, this Yiddish lot just because of who they are and irrespective of where they come from automatically, whether they request it or not, are deemed by that racist, apartheid and Zionist entity in the Middle East and commonly referred to as Israel to be its lawful citizens. And it makes no difference at all if these alleged citizens ever set foot in Israel or plan on ever going there to live. So Ed Miliband, Luciana Berger �" most definitely a German Surname if ever there was one, and how ironically so �" David Cameron, Boris Johnson et al are, as per this specifically twisted mindset, bona fide citizens of Israel; and while most people do understand the commonsensical and legal concept of dual nationality this is clearly not one of those cases. And just endeavour to imagine what a furore there would be from these same people if South Africa whose white Caucasian, Jewish population is 0.137% compared to Britain’s that stands at 0.49% were to immediately rescind the citizenship of all these Judaists along with that of other white Caucasians living or entitled to live there and start giving South African citizenship only to persons whose skin colour was distinctly BLACK.

 

But while Ed Miliband, Luciana Berger and others of their Yiddish ilk in the Labour Party as well as throughout the Conservative and the Lib-Dem parties can brazenly thwart the political ambitions of genuinely talented Black British citizens whose numbers comprise 3.5% of the entire British population compared to 0.459% of all Yiddish Judaists resident in Britain, and moreover conceitedly expect to run the UK, control the lives of all those who live in it yet have the luxury as well as the automatic right as citizens of Israel to literally piss off and live there either when it suits them or whenever they want to, or even more appallingly take to using their nepotistically enshrined political and economic power and power bases here within the UK and other countries in the west, notoriously the US, France and Germany �" how absolutely bloody ironic a situation can one really conjure up bearing in mind these particular countries notorious and methodically well-documented roles in and their criminal culpability in and responsibility at varying times for Europe’s holocaust, the Zyklon B gas for example that was widely used in the Nazi death camps throughout Europe was both manufactured in and sold to the Third Reich by the United States �" to characteristically and genocidally wipe out the Palestinians who - just like Diane Abbott wouldn’t be - don’t automatically or otherwise qualify for Israeli citizenship or would either her or they be granted it, is a situation I strongly feel that every right thinking, conscionable and principled person either individually or jointly with likeminded persons must unrelentingly confront, fight against and with every conceivable means at their disposal, that I steadfastly and unapologetically believe must include violence if necessary, ultimately destroy. For it’s quite evident that the only language that these murderous Yiddish thugs masquerading as civilized human beings do understand is what they themselves practise to those whom they unwarrantedly despise, hate and wish to destroy..

 

Notwithstanding the lying, white racist propaganda to the contrary however, Blacks have been in Britain continuously since the days of Roman Britain. At that time they comprised not only the Roman military but were also Britain’s Roman administrators and aristocracy; and all this when the only white residents in Britain were the Celts whose own ancestors incidentally were similarly African. Please, don’t take my word for it just go and check it out for yourselves. For these Celts having migrated from Africa to the Iberian Peninsular and afterwards through what we know today as France eventually crossed over the land bridge that physically joined Britain to mainland Europe �" there was distinctly no English Channel then nor was Britain an island as it is now �" and decided to settle on our green and pleasant land.

 

How did these Celts essentially end up becoming “white” in complexion? Pretty simple really, since it’s not rocket science to work that out. Centuries’ long migration, as their journey to the British Isles didn’t happen in a few hours or even a couple of days �" no BA or Easy Jet to ferry them there then I’m afraid �" together with reciprocally dwelling among, marrying of course or merely just sexually fraternizing with the local, white continental Caucasians whom they came across on their stopovers �" not that different I suspect, and can back up with clear-cut evidence as well, from quite a lot of you gallivanting off to Spain, Tunisia, Barbados, Jamaica, Antigua, the Dominican Republic or the rest of the Caribbean Islands and having it off there as well with the locals. But while you clearly have the benefit of the contraceptive pill, the condom or even the morning after pill these migrating Celts didn’t; and anyway who can say with any absolute certainty that these Celtic people or their reciprocally amorously involved local continental and white wives or partners gave a damn about getting pregnant, if they were women obviously, or for that matter putting the females whom they were likewise romantically involved with up the spout if they were men? And pray why on earth should they have done when they were plainly behaving quite normally, enjoying themselves in the bargain, and didn’t have the same sexual hang-ups that significant numbers of white Caucasian Brits customarily and oh so deceitfully, certainly in the case of our women folk, display at home but for some perverse reason or other rapidly ditch when they’re abroad.

 

Besides neither this customary intermarriage nor its associated, quite unpretentiously enjoyable and sexual fraternizing thousands of years ago mustn’t be viewed in the contemporary context of purblind racism and its ludicrously prominent, white supremacist and Master Race nonsense that in 2014 bedevils much of the west and regrettably significant sections of British society as well. For notwithstanding the aforementioned remarks there’s even now in the 21^st Century and increasingly so in Britain nothing specifically unusual about voluntary racial blending, as there are several such relationships that I personally know of with Afro-Caribbean grandparents and even parents - some of them in my own familial Diaspora - that who while incontestably Black themselves biologically all the same have perfectly white Caucasian descendants in the form of children, grandchildren and even great-grandchildren. And it’s a sure bet that racial and sexual discrimination which is a relatively modern phenomenon which officially came into effect and the world’s consciousness only after the brutal induction of the Transatlantic Slave Trade and colonialism but in actuality was significantly not adhered to especially by white Caucasian males vis-à-vis black slave girls and women whom these whites “lawfully” had ownership of and with impunity could sexually abuse and often did to their hearts’ content - hence the undisputed fact that all Afro-Caribbean Blacks and considerable numbers of other Blacks across the United States specifically and the Americas generally carry within their personal DNA the white male Y chromosome �" did not exist during the 500 odd years that these Black Romans were living in and ruling Britain.

 

Therefore logic and natural commonsense dictate that many white Britons of Celtic descent are in 2014 unknowingly for them carrying Black genes in their own DNA makeup, and since post the Roman presence in Britain these Celts have freely carried on either marrying or fraternizing sexually with immigrants to Britain from continental Europe or elsewhere that there’s bound to be, as in the case of Afro-Caribbeans carrying in their own genetic makeup the Y chromosome of white Caucasian males, a similar all pervasive situation relative to that of the Celts and their descendants corresponding to the Black DNA that they are biologically even if unknowingly so endowed with. To which end I usually allow myself a smug smile whenever I see or hear these white racist a******s who know bugger all about British history as it really was and not as their fantasies dictate talk about themselves as indigenous Brits.

 

To start with there were no Angles or Saxons or any Vikings etc in Britain during the extensive period of the Roman’s stay in Britain. Moreover, both the Angles and Saxons were two distinct German tribes �" the Angles farmers while the Saxons were basically warriors �" that hated each other’s guts and were often at loggerheads with each other. What’s more their overall impact in England where they congregated primarily in the east coast areas or thereabouts was negligible to say the least until, that is, the arrival of the Normans who weren’t actually French as they’re often misleadingly represented as but Scandinavians. Scandinavians who were kicked out from their northern European homelands because of their intolerable savagery, were given refuge in Normandy by the incumbent French monarch and like all savage b******s ultimately turned on their French hosts and took over France completely. They did though learn to speak French.

 

However growing increasingly restless for more power, status, land and of course the sense of adventure that was always foremost in their minds and their blood these Scandinavians who’d resorted to calling themselves Normans decided under their Duke William to invade what was basically a fragmented England and successfully managed to conquer it in 1066. Interestingly enough this was the very first time that the now quite common terminology English came into practice, wrought from a merger of convenience forged between two previous foes the Angles and the Saxons in order to repel the Normans but which was nevertheless terribly unsuccessful militarily. The Angles and Saxons �" or the new English �" lost dreadfully against the Normans but from a developmental perspective their lost was England’s gain. For there’s no doubt at all that the dynamism and drive together with the Normans’ foresight and ambition were what laid the foundation on which an absolute European backwater that England was after the departure of the Romans, led to this off-shore European entity becoming not only a force to be reckoned with European-wise but also saw it subsequently morph into the redoubtable phenomenon that was the British Empire.

 

All of which had f**k all really to do with the Angles or Saxons individually or collectively and who, had it not been for the Normans and with the Black Romans having long departed, if they’d been left entirely to their own devices Britain generally and England specifically would in all probability not have become the unitary state they are today and instead would have been hugely fragmented into considerably disunited and incessantly warring entities with markedly less influence in the modern context than what Andorra has internationally. So personally and also from a historical perspective I don’t think that much of either the Angles or the Saxons but will cheerfully allow those who want to claim exclusive biological kith and kinship ties to them and asininely assume that by doing so that undoubtedly makes them the indigenous population of England specifically and Britain per se; my disdainful response to that is, please feel free to do so if that’s what turns you on, and at the same time foolishly imbues you with this farcical sense of racial superiority and purblind exceptionalism that you tend with mindboggling and a determinedly consummate delusion to bestow on yourselves; but let’s be perfectly frank about all this �" delusions have never or won’t ever turn fantasy into reality. Rather crucially though and exceptionally PR savvy even for that epoch in which they lived the Normans, it has to be said, cleverly threw a political bone to the locals by officially referring to their new territorial conquest as England and adopted the new expression English for themselves as well.

 

So it’s utterly ludicrous for a bunch of white Caucasian morons in the 21^st Century living in a country with a very chequered and mongrelized past to be claiming homogeneity of England and even Britain by risibly referring to themselves as the indigenous and exclusively authentic residents and the de facto owners of Britain. Notwithstanding of course the glaringly statistical fact that 20^th and 21^st Century British mums routinely across the board cuckold their husbands, partners, boyfriends and even their lovers to a staggering degree of 36%, getting them to father, financially support and even raise children that they unknowingly and in many cases never find out that they never sired. Yet these are the very people who generally want Britain cleansed of Blacks that were here and carried on being so long before their sort ever set foot on these here British shores.

 

Curiously enough it’s a similar stance taken by Boris Bey. Who is he I hear you ask? Well it’s none other than Boris Johnson the incumbent Mayor of London and wannabe PM of the UK. Boris for starters wasn’t even born in the UK but New York in the United States of America. His paternal great grandfather was Ali Kemel Bey who was the Interior Minister in the Damat Ferid Pasha government; Pasha in turn being the Grand Vizier of the then Ottoman Empire. So Boris’ roots are very much Turkish as is his conveniently discarded familial name. A marked difference from Black Transatlantic slaves who had theirs forcibly taken from them and were obliged to carry the names given to them and their descendants by white Caucasian plantation owners and other whites who “legally owned” them.

 

However for purely opportunistic reasons and, of course, well aware that the Ottoman Empire a staunch and military ally of Germany with whom it was jointly waging World War I against Britain and its Empire were in the process of losing that war, Boris’ paternal grandfather along with his sister who was Boris’ great aunt, would you believe, quite intriguingly got themselves recognized as British subjects, which they evidently weren’t. A situation that allowed these two antecedent and particularly close Turkish relatives of Boris to easily and puzzlingly qualify for the very same citizenship that my late Afro-Caribbean great uncle Aubrey together with others of his race from Barbados and elsewhere around the British Caribbean automatically had thrust upon them because they were deemed to be “colonials” of whatever British Caribbean colony they were born in. Interestingly enough though, while they were bravely fighting and dying in the stinking trenches and on the battlefields of Europe for Britain in the war which supposedly was to end all wars, Boris’ Ottoman relatives were the ones along with their German allies that were doing their level best to wipe them out and defeat Britain - and we all know exactly what happened to the combined British and Empire Forces from the colonies in those Godforsaken trenches and on the equally forlorn battlefields of Europe. Thankfully with the assistance of its “colonial” forces Britain won World War 1.

 

My great uncle Aubrey and the few of his Barbadian colleagues who were fortunate to survive the carnage unleashed on them on Europe’s battlefields where they fought returned at the war’s end to Barbados as did their similarly surviving, fellow Caribbean, World War I contributors to their respective island homes to unfortunately and speedily find themselves completely ignored and entirely forgotten as they still are in 2014 �" 100 years after the start of that first World War in which they were all highly admirable and exceedingly remarkable, altruistic volunteers �" by successive UK governments including the existing Con-Dem regime, Buckingham Palace and the British Ministry of Defence. Not so however, those from the white Dominions of Australia, Canada and New Zealand; and notwithstanding, of course, that Britain’s own domestic Armed Forces at the time had its own Black components within them.

 

In perceptible contrast however to how those of my own family members together with other brave Afro-Caribbeans that participated in World War I were contemptibly treated afterwards the distinctly Ottoman enemy relatives of Boris were instead awarded with British citizenship, with Boris’ paternal grandfather and that man’s sister, and Boris’ great aunt, cynically ditching their Turkish surname and all of its associated connotations with World War I and the rest of it and expediently assuming instead the maiden name of their grandmother, which was Johnson; the identical surname that family carries to this day. Yes, I do know that it’s commonplace for Jews in Britain and elsewhere globally and across the Atlantic in the United States and Canada especially to take on anglicized names for a diversity of reasons. Ask Leon Brittan or Michael Howard or perhaps John Kerry why their families did. But the utterly shabby manner in which Black Caribbean World War I veterans were treated after that war ended and particularly with their sterling contribution to it practically expunged when set alongside what was rolled out for the Turkish Ottoman Bey family of Boris “Johnson” I find absolutely sickening.

 

Now we have Boris passing himself off as the quintessential Anglo-Saxon Englishman �" when he’s nothing of the kind �" and his goddam siblings and their entire family tribe doing the same, and all of them collectively and fervently hoping for some means or other to be legally devised where Britain would be completely bereft of Blacks while another Yiddish aspirant, in the form of Boris, marches on without any sense of irony whatsoever, as is these Yiddish folk collective forte, towards his individual quest to become Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; while the remainder of the white Caucasian a******s who make up the majority of our electorate, in their purblind ignorance ecstatically permit themselves to be cynically manipulated and customarily conned by these Yiddish- Nazi, wholly insufferable and white Caucasian in appearance Zionist Judaists.

 

How odd that white Brits who per se can rejoice at the likes of Tony Abbott born in England or Julia Gilliard whose parents stem from Wales can aspire to and actually achieve the position of Prime Minister of Australia �" something which no Aborigine whose ancestors lived there quite unmolested for in excess of 60,000 (YES SIXTY THOUSAND) years before any white man or woman ever knew of the existence of that place �" yet notwithstanding their own so-called kith and kin regularly emigrating there don’t mind that there are no Blacks in the UK’s government or its shadow one. Nor any genuine prospect either of any Black individual ever holding down, and doing so strictly on merit, a key Cabinet post or ever becoming Prime Minister of the UK. And while most of these whites asininely delude themselves that Britain would be better off if fewer or no Blacks at all were in Britain, they none the less see nothing wrong with their so-called kith and kin emigrating to other peoples’ countries and not simply living there but also taking these countries over and running them exclusively for their own bloody benefit and that of other white Caucasians like themselves. Just take a cursory look at Australia’s immigration laws in which the Aborigines play no part and then honestly ask yourselves what race is most likely to be given favourable immigration status to that country and those that won’t be. Yet everyone of these white Caucasian Australian born or immigrant c***s can effortlessly saunter back to the UK or mainland Europe whenever they want to, stay here and no questions asked.

 

In the British Sunday Post in an article headed “Prescott slams Israel war crimes” the former Deputy Leader of the British Labour Party had this to say: “Israel’s brutally disproportionate and grossly indiscriminate bombardment must be regarded as a war crime.” Honestly adding: “Any other country would be made an international pariah if it acted in the same way. This as the reported death toll from Israel’s savage and disproportionate offensive now tops over 1,400 killed, with the overwhelming majority of these victims being women, children and the elderly; while the disturbing and escalating number of those that are seriously injured is considerably higher and runs into the tens of thousands.

 

John Prescott then directly compared the situation in Gaza with a concentration camp, sensibly suggesting, as I’ve repeatedly done in all of my previous articles on Israel, that Europe’s Nazi holocaust should have given the “Israelis a unique sense of perspective and empathy with the victims of a ghetto.” Regrettably not so however, as polls conducted in Israel unambiguously show that some 90% of its Yiddish population has no empathy at all with the native people of Palestine, is most definitely in favour of more genocidal actions against them, and in effect are calling for all Palestinians to be exterminated, as they resolutely carry on rallying behind their Nazi mass butcher and massive war crimes exponent Benjamin Netanyahu, his contemptuous and criminal exploits actively and militarily assisted by the United States of America, the UK and the rest of the EU that jointly are also financing these murderous operations conducted by the Israelis.

 

Condemning Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu for trotting out the same excuses ad infinitum Mr Prescott likewise astutely remarked that: “A nation which blasted a hospital, shelled and killed children from a gunboat as they played football on a beach and was responsible for over 1000 deaths, at least 165 of them children, in just two weeks surely it would be branded as a pariah state [and] condemned by the United Nations, the US and the UK. [Furthermore] the calls for regime change would be deafening. But these howls of protest are muted. [And moreover] the condemnation softened. For this is Israel.”

 

Currently the western world is apoplectic over the downing of Malaysian Flight MH 17 casting blame and vilification at Russia and particularly President Putin with no evidence provided and only bigoted speculation of what caused it to crash. Nick Clegg the current Deputy PM of the UK but who is almost certainly less known of in Britain as the infamous arsonist he also is, and whose affluent parents were able to buy off German officials to prevent him being dispatched off to jail for the destructive arson attack he lawlessly and with consummate feral intent carried out in Germany but in spite of his own criminal penchant likewise bigotedly and recklessly wanted excessively harsh legal punishments to be meted out by the courts to all those whom he suspected of being involved in the 2011 English riots, expressing quite emphatically on Radio Nottingham that he had no empathy whatsoever with “criminals”, a perverse attitude he now just as stupidly projects towards Russia and more explicitly its President, demanding that FIFA strip Russia of hosting the 2018 Football World Cup, yet at the same time has no difficulty at all in cheerfully accommodating and even ardently egging on the barbarities being perpetrated by Israel against the Palestinian people.

 

Firmly set beside that bizarre detail that this incredibly ludicrous aspirant for Prime Minister of Britain �" a particularly laughable concept if ever there was one �" and whose close non-British ancestral lineage is significantly more mongrel and diverse in its composition than even that of Turkish Ottoman, Boris Bey-Johnson �" Nick Clegg’s own mother after all is Dutch, for Christ sake, making his sprogs by his Spanish and Francoesque wife Miriam Gonzalez de facto even less British than Nick is himself; yet for all that and ironically so as well, this markedly idiotic man wants “immigrants” �" and we all know perfectly well who he means - to be cleared out of Britain; and furthermore imbued with that mindset obdurately sees not only indisputably Black Britons like Diane Abbot, Ian Wright and others of their race as essentially being unwelcomed anywhere in the UK but their equally British born and raised children as well; and in a way that were anyone to likewise target his and Miriam’s sprogs he’d be among the very first to be up in arms about that.

 

But how about this? Nick Clegg as I said earlier deludes himself that he could become PM of Britain. Nothing wrong with that even in abnormal circumstance as ambition is one thing while arrogance is another altogether; and besides with Maggie Thatcher’s government having closed down many of our mental hospitals there has as a direct result of that action been considerably more lunatics than previously not only walking the streets of Britain but also even roaming the corridors of power. But what I find specifically more telling about Nick Clegg’s position is that his Spanish wife Miriam Gonzalez who clearly as a white woman and furthermore one married to the Deputy PM of Britain could and most definitely would automatically qualify as a British Citizen or could if she chose to hold dual nationality, like Boris Bey-Johnson has for example, has however resolutely stuck to adhering to her birth nationality which is Spanish.

 

What’s wrong with that I hear you ask? Nothing per se except that by doing so she is ineligible to vote in British General Elections. Now the cynics among us would assert that a wife married to a man who herself doesn’t care about voting for him in elections that could actually catapult him to the highest political office in his country and that he so desperately even if hopelessly so covets, is clearly making a very strong statement. I know what my personal views on that exact matter is; but what you think is really none of my business and is totally up to you. But even so it’s none the less food for thought wouldn’t you say? And if I were a voter, and thank God I’m not, in Nick Clegg’s constituency it’s something I’d be cogitating over.

 

Another individual that I’ve taken considerable exception to is Maxima Zorreguieta Cerruti the erstwhile Argentinean now makeover Dutch consort of the Netherland’s Willem Alexander and I’m doing so principally because of what were her obviously contrived tears publicly exhibited when coffins bearing the remains of some of those killed when MH17 crashed were flown back to the Netherlands. This female simpleton quite candidly did not know any of these people and bald-facedly and rather ostentatiously taking to crying and furthermore openly doing so, except in exceptional circumstances that personally and directly impact on you, is nothing more than a cheap and self-serving attention seeking subterfuge in my opinion. However, unsurprisingly no such tears though from this Argentinean woman for the Palestinian children or the collective in excess of 1,400 innocent civilians and refugees who have so far been savagely slaughtered by the Israelis amid the active support of their western backers, and that includes the Netherlands, and whose spiralling numbers in terms of their dead continue to rise by the hour.

 

But why realistically would Maxima Zorreguieta Cerruti whose country Argentina completely eradicated its indigenous population, whose father Jorge Zorreguieta was deeply implicated in the Argentinean military dictatorship and the thousands of disappeared people there - many of whom firmly shacked were simply bundled onto military aircraft and dropped from a height of 30,000 feet to their impending and barbaric deaths into the expansive and waiting waters of the Southern Atlantic Ocean - and whose husband’s grandfather, Bernhard was an estimably proud Waffen-SS Nazi officer, either want to empathize with the Palestinians or actually shed tears �" contrived or otherwise �" for the Gazan dead? Emphatically not the kind of photo-op that she’d like to see her daff Argentinean cum Dutch mug associated with and copiously plastered either across the Dutch or other bigoted western media in her attention seeking endeavour as was the case with the corpses from MH17.

 

Interestingly enough the savagely barbaric era of the Argentinean military dictatorship and the atrocities associated with it were US instigated as was the downing of Malaysian Flight MH17 and the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians.