The carnal dissemblance by influential, British Establishment Paedophiles!

It's possible to fool most people some of the time but not everyone all of the time!

By Stanley Collymore

 

They talk openly, ardently and seemingly even credibly,

but oh so dishonestly, about moral principles and

how our nation’s children should be protected

from wanton abuse and intentional harm;

yet behind closed doors their personal

actions couldn’t be more different

from their public pronouncements,

with private lives markedly

reeking with the ghastly

ubiquitous stench of

resilient carrion.

 

For these are our Establishment abusers: well

heeled celebrity gropers, sexual abusers,

paedophiles, child-traffickers and

even murderers - who not only

consider themselves to be above the

law but who in many instances, as our

political representatives, ironically

make these same laws from

whose consequences they

then absolve themselves

with explicit and

breath-taking

impunity.

 

Fully aware that any incumbent Home Secretary,

the Home Office, its Senior Civil Servants, the

Police and the CPS will concur with these

appalling travesties of legality, either by

being complicit in them themselves,

or else affording these powerful

and considerably influential but

loathsome perpetrators the

customary privilege

freely accorded to

them of blanket

immunity!

 

© Stanley V. Collymore

9 July 2014.

 

Author’s Observation:

In Britain the law is generally seen as an a*s by Establishment figures and the privileged elites and therefore contemptuously treated as a needless inconvenience by them. Hardly surprising then that they conspiratorially and pertinaciously ensure that we have donkeys administering it.

 

Reviews

[Rene Salinas]

Well I coudn't share the sentiment on this more fervorously even if I tried. Apparently there are in between fifty thousand to seventy five thousands confessed child abusers roaming on the darknet freely going about their business. And as you pointed out unconciously or conciously are left to their own devices as if they where doing in the best interest of society at large. Not only this is beyond any concept of legality. It makes a mockey of any sort of attempt to become politically involved as there doesn't seem to be anything good to adhere oneself to.

On a lighter not and seeing that I am more inclined towards poetry the unintented Blanket of immunity or immunity blanket was ammusing.

I applaud your point of view and share the anger and frustration