To be quite honest, I think you could do better than this. Having read some of your other stuff, I was slightly disappointed. Not to say this poem doesn't have potential or is bad. It's not bad at all.
I love the idea of it, the connecting of the synapses making things more clear and the limitations posed by the outside world. There's just something missing in the execution, but that's why you put your things on here right? To get feedback on what's missing.
I think your lines need to either be long or short. The few really long lines threw me off. It would probably help to break it up in stanzas. I had trouble getting all the way through it the first time and had to go back and take it slow to get any meaning whatsoever. I think that's mostly formatting.
Also, I think this poem would be great with some meter, but that's just my personal opinion (I'm a meter junky and use meter like some people use drugs). It actually wouldn't be too awfully hard to turn it into something iambic. The first four lines are written in iambs at least. I stopped scansion after the seventh line because I didn't feel meter and figured it was meant as free verse. Sorry if that was just my bad ear.
I think more description in certain areas could help. The "object untouchable" is that the connection? Maybe "this" would be more clear than "an" if that's the case? Or is it something else entirely.
I like the juxtaposed lines "Of pure beauty/ -- not just any beauty". That's lovely, and so is your use of dashes.
I also like your ending. The senses fade out with the poem, and I think that's a nice effect.
I realize that this review is picky, and I hope you're not offended. I find you to be a very talented writer; therefore, I feel it is important that you get what you need to become even better. Really, a rough review from me is rather a compliment. If you were actually bad, I wouldn't write anything.
Posted 11 Years Ago
2 of 2 people found this review constructive.
11 Years Ago
If I had a folder to place reviews in, this would be in my "TOP TEN" folder. Great review, and I tha.. read moreIf I had a folder to place reviews in, this would be in my "TOP TEN" folder. Great review, and I thank you greatly!
No, nothing came across offensive at all, and there's nothing here is disagree with. When I get the minute, I'll certainly sit down and tear this piece apart.
To be quite honest, I think you could do better than this. Having read some of your other stuff, I was slightly disappointed. Not to say this poem doesn't have potential or is bad. It's not bad at all.
I love the idea of it, the connecting of the synapses making things more clear and the limitations posed by the outside world. There's just something missing in the execution, but that's why you put your things on here right? To get feedback on what's missing.
I think your lines need to either be long or short. The few really long lines threw me off. It would probably help to break it up in stanzas. I had trouble getting all the way through it the first time and had to go back and take it slow to get any meaning whatsoever. I think that's mostly formatting.
Also, I think this poem would be great with some meter, but that's just my personal opinion (I'm a meter junky and use meter like some people use drugs). It actually wouldn't be too awfully hard to turn it into something iambic. The first four lines are written in iambs at least. I stopped scansion after the seventh line because I didn't feel meter and figured it was meant as free verse. Sorry if that was just my bad ear.
I think more description in certain areas could help. The "object untouchable" is that the connection? Maybe "this" would be more clear than "an" if that's the case? Or is it something else entirely.
I like the juxtaposed lines "Of pure beauty/ -- not just any beauty". That's lovely, and so is your use of dashes.
I also like your ending. The senses fade out with the poem, and I think that's a nice effect.
I realize that this review is picky, and I hope you're not offended. I find you to be a very talented writer; therefore, I feel it is important that you get what you need to become even better. Really, a rough review from me is rather a compliment. If you were actually bad, I wouldn't write anything.
Posted 11 Years Ago
2 of 2 people found this review constructive.
11 Years Ago
If I had a folder to place reviews in, this would be in my "TOP TEN" folder. Great review, and I tha.. read moreIf I had a folder to place reviews in, this would be in my "TOP TEN" folder. Great review, and I thank you greatly!
No, nothing came across offensive at all, and there's nothing here is disagree with. When I get the minute, I'll certainly sit down and tear this piece apart.
Ignorance does pose a threat. Particularly when it's heavily armed. I liked this poem. The lines are like rounds coming at you. So I'm being shot at by words reading this. Good Job Young man.
Posted 11 Years Ago
11 Years Ago
Thank you for giving this a shot! :)
I see you've reviewed a few of my pieces, so send .. read moreThank you for giving this a shot! :)
I see you've reviewed a few of my pieces, so send me a message with links to any particular pieces you might want me to look at. :)
Chris, this was thought provoking and posed questions that constantly flood my brain. I have often thought that many of us are connected by that single thread and in most cases we don't know until it slowly pulls us together. Great poem my friend.
Posted 11 Years Ago
11 Years Ago
Thanks, Jack! Send me a message to remind me to look at some of your pieces. :) I'll let you choose .. read moreThanks, Jack! Send me a message to remind me to look at some of your pieces. :) I'll let you choose which ones you want me to look at. It's been a minute since I've been on your page.
Thanks again for reading! I've always liked your responses.
Laughing might be my weakness, but my humor is the only characteristic that drives my positivity in this damned world. I'm a bit blunt at times, but always respectful >>and to be blunt, I expect respe.. more..